Court rules Trump’s firing of labor board official illegal, saying president is not a king | US news

Court rules Trump’s firing of labor board official illegal, saying president is not a king | US news

In a landmark decision, a federal court has ruled that Donald Trump’s sudden dismissal of Gwynne Wilcox, a former senior official at the top US labor watchdog, was unlawful. The court has ordered her immediate reinstatement, marking a significant victory for Wilcox and upholding the rule of law.

Wilcox, who was the first member of the National Labor Relations Board to be removed by a US president since the board’s establishment in 1935, filed a lawsuit challenging her removal as a blatant violation of the National Labor Relations Act. The Act specifies that board members can only be removed for negligence or misconduct, neither of which applied to Wilcox.

During the hearing, Judge Beryl A Howell emphasized the importance of upholding the constitution and preventing any individual, including the President, from assuming monarchical powers. She underscored that the President does not have the authority to dismiss members of the National Labor Relations Board at will, as it goes against the law and the principles enshrined in the US Constitution.

Wilcox, who was confirmed by the Senate in September 2023 and was supposed to serve until August 2028, expressed her readiness to return to work and continue her duties on the board. Her attorney, Deepak Gupta, highlighted that this legal battle was just the beginning of a longer fight to protect the integrity of the NLRB and ensure fair labor practices in the country.

The ruling has drawn criticism from the White House, which defended Wilcox’s removal, citing her alleged radical views on labor law. However, the court’s decision reaffirms the independence of the NLRB and sets a precedent for upholding the rule of law in the face of political pressures.

Former NLRB chairs and labor leaders have condemned Wilcox’s removal, arguing that it undermines the agency’s independence and threatens federal labor law enforcement. The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US, has shown support for Wilcox, emphasizing the importance of her reinstatement in ensuring fair labor practices and upholding workers’ rights.

In conclusion, the court’s ruling in favor of Gwynne Wilcox sends a strong message about the importance of upholding the rule of law and protecting the independence of regulatory bodies like the National Labor Relations Board. It serves as a reminder that no individual, regardless of their position, is above the law in a democratic society.