Schumer Averts a Shutdown—and Ignites a Rebellion

T
This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up
here
to receive similar stories directly in your inbox.

On Friday, the Senate took steps to prevent a government shutdown, effectively relinquishing spending authority to President Donald Trump and reducing Congress to a mere advisory capacity. This decision has sparked outrage among the Democratic base, marking a significant retreat for the party.

The ire of many Democrats is largely directed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, who indicated just a day prior that the battle was over and it was time to move forward. The choice was stark: keep the government functioning in a limited capacity or shut it down entirely, and the results speak volumes.

However, this does not imply that party members were satisfied with the outcome.

When asked if it was time for new leadership among Senate Democrats, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries opted not to support Schumer, responding curtly, “Next question.” Discussions have surfaced in various circles about potentially challenging Schumer in the 2028 primary.

On Friday, nine Senate Democrats, along with Independent Angus King of Maine, aligned with nearly all Senate Republicans to avoid a government shutdown. The temporary spending bill grants the White House greater latitude to shut down numerous federal operations and eliminate thousands of jobs. Consequently, Congress is, at least until September 30, effectively empowering the executive branch to act with considerable freedom regarding the funds they allocate.

This decision marked a disappointing climax to a challenging week for Democrats. Amid the chaotic developments emerging from the Trump administration—including new executive orders, personnel changes, and tariffs—they were also confronted with the looming threat of a government shutdown. House Republicans pushed through a spending plan that many Democrats found particularly offensive due to its cuts affecting the District of Columbia. Subsequently, the House departed, leaving the Senate with no opportunity to amend the budget. Schumer initially claimed that the proposed framework lacked sufficient support, only to reverse course the following day and endorse the spending plan to avert a shutdown.

The abrupt shift from a shutdown mentality to a compromise stance further fueled the discontentment many Democrats felt towards their leadership.

“Whatever happens will happen,” remarked Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who voted against the plan and used the lead-up to the vote to express a sense of dark resignation.

This sense of resignation has been palpable in Washington in recent weeks. The discord among various anti-Trump factions has subsided as Trump’s assertive takeover of the budgetary process appeared increasingly unavoidable. The triumphant atmosphere in the White House, alongside the antics surrounding its pet-project DOGE, has only intensified the frustrations of Democrats striving to defend the integrity of federal operations.

Ultimately, the Democrats in a position to counter Trump and his Republican allies yielded. Although the GOP holds majorities in both the House and Senate, as well as the presidency, Senate rules necessitate 60 votes to initiate proceedings, and Republicans only had 52 affirmative votes in the Upper Chamber. This required GOP lawmakers to secure eight Democratic votes to move forward.

Senate Democrats evaluated the numbers, the polling data, and their own capabilities. They concluded that their desire to oppose Trump’s expansive authority did not align with their ability to effectively do so. Political scientists often note that true power lies where will and capacity converge. Democrats had the power to initiate a government shutdown but lacked the means to convincingly attribute the blame to Republicans or present a cohesive strategy for reopening the government under more favorable conditions.

The pressing issue now is how Democrats navigate the situation surrounding Schumer. Currently, there is a notable silence, but whispers of discontent are rising regarding Schumer’s future as Minority Leader for the remainder of this term. Both progressive factions and the general party base are uneasy about this decision, and steering the party through the tumultuous waters leading up to 2026 is no small feat.